Police

Statement From AG Wilson on Flock Cameras

(COLUMBUS, Ohio) — Ohio Attorney General Andy Wilson issued the following statement today regarding the use of Flock license plate reader technology by law enforcement:

“Law enforcement relies on technology, and Ohioans rely on law enforcement to leverage technology to society’s benefit.

There is no question that technological advances have changed the landscape for law enforcement. Body-worn cameras, acoustic gunshot detection systems, and other devices allow peace officers to more effectively – and safely – carry out their duties in today’s world.

Technology expands peace officers’ reach and helps protect communities, even when an officer is not present. Law enforcement has an obligation to use technology that enhances public safety.

One such device is Flock, an automatic license plate reader. License plate recognition systems are tools of identification designed to assist in criminal investigations. They are not tools of surveillance.

When used properly, Flock is one of the most valuable tools I have seen in my career. In Ohio alone, it has helped solve thousands of cases, often by helping law enforcement track down violent criminals and locate missing children.

By and large, Flock is used appropriately and effectively to accomplish a great deal of good. But, like any other high-tech tool that law enforcement depends on, it is only as effective as the person operating it and interpreting the data.

There are some officers with bad intentions who have misused Flock. A few such cases recently attracted media attention, sparking debate about the technology. It’s worth noting, however, that law enforcement agencies themselves, as part of their internal auditing process, identified the problems and raised the concerns.

Misuse of Flock is rare, and breaches should result in serious consequences. To that end, the Ohio General Assembly should criminalize the misuse of Flock just as it currently criminalizes the misuse of other law enforcement technology.

Unauthorized use of the Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway (OHLEG), for example, is a fifth-degree felony that requires law enforcement officers convicted of the charge to surrender their badge. This standard should serve as a baseline for state legislators.  

Ohio can – and should – leverage technology that assists law enforcement. We must do so carefully. And misuse must not be tolerated.”